ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS A FACTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: FEATURES OF MANIFESTATION IN FORESTRY

Authors

  • Oksana Sakal Public Institution «Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine»
  • Наталія Третяк Public Institution “Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”
  • Галина Штогрин Public Institution “Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”
  • Іван Бегаль Public Institution “Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31471/2409-0948-2020-2(22)-164-172

Keywords:

principles of entrepreneurship, economic development, sustainable development, ecological and social functions of forests, nature using.

Abstract

The article presents the results of the study the essence and features of entrepreneurship manifestation in forestry in terms of assessing the realities and prospects of its development in Ukraine. For this purpose, it is studied general principles of doing business (entrepreneurship) in Ukraine, legal norms that determine the general features of entrepreneurship in this area. Based on the multifunctionality of forests, it is substantiated that entrepreneurial activity in forestry has a deeper ecological, economic and social meaning, compared to other areas of activity. It is noted that the dual nature of forest resources causes the diversification of types and organizational forms of entrepreneurship throughout the forest sector. Extended reproduction in the research area according to the concept of sustainable development has an impact on the well-being of more than one generation. This factor becomes decisive in the latest economic conditions and determines the adoption of appropriate measures of economic stimulation of the intensive type of economic growth of expanded forest production. The results of the analysis of the activities of forestry enterprises, corporate interests of forestry activities, as well as the role of the state and environmental insurance are the basis for determining the prospects for long- and short-term temporary use of forests in Ukraine. It is noted that the development of the study field of economy of Ukraine, in conjunction with measures of financial and economic incentives wood industry can contribute to the development of the last one.

The study on the example of forestry allowed us to generalize that the entrepreneurial vector of nature using is to organize and support business activities of nature users, in their relations with other economic entities of various forms of ownership, with the state under existing and exacerbating environmental restrictions. and burdens, taking into account the ecological and social functions and services of ecosystems.

References

Pro pidpryiemnytstvo : Zakon Ukrainy vid 07.02.1991 No. 698-XII. U redaktsii vid 29.01.2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/698-12#top.

Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 No. 436-IV. U redaktsii vid 16.08.2020 URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15#Text.

GRI, UN Global Compact, WBCSD (2016). The guide for business action on the SDGs. URL: https://sdgcompass.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/SDG_Compass_Guide_Ukranian.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Karpuk A., Shestak M. (2015). Instytutsionalni peredumovy pidvyshchennia ekoloho-ekonomichnoi efektyvnosti lisokorystuvannia. Ekonomist, 10, 3–7 [in Ukrainian].

Mishenin Ye. V., Mishenina N. V., Yarova I. Ye. (2013). Rozvytok marketynhu ekosystemnoi produktsii ta posluh u lisoresursnii sferi. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii, 2, 209–219 [in Ukrainian].

Mishenin Y., Yarova I., Mishenina H. (2019). Features of Foresight Methodology Application in the Forestry Complex of Ukraine: Sectoral and Spatial Aspect. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 229–240. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.4-18.

Sahaidak Yu. V. (2016). Pidpryiemnytska diialnist yak osnovna forma realizatsii ekonomichnykh prav liudyny. Teoretyko-pravovyi aspekt. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, 7, 44–48 [in Ukrainian].

Pirs P. (2006). Osnovy ekonomiky lisovoho hospodarstva. Kyiv: EKO-inform [in Ukrainian].

Holian V. A., Demydiuk S. M. (2010). Pidpryiemnytstvo u lisovomu sektori yak faktor sotsialno-ekonomichnoho pidnesennia silskykh terytorii. Ahrosvit, 14, 2–10 [in Ukrainian].

Ministerstvo zakhystu dovkillia ta pryrodnykh resursiv Ukrainy (2020). Publichnyi zvit Derzhavnoho ahentstva lisovykh resursiv Ukrainy za 2019 rik. URL: shorturl.at/bjqY2.

DP Korostyshivskyi lishosp APK. URL: http://korostishivlisapk.com.ua/pro-nas/naprjami-dijalnosti.html [in Ukrainian].

Lisovyi kodeks Ukrainy v redaktsii Zakonu No. 3404-IV vid 08.02.2006; zi zminamy vid 03.07.2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3852-12#top.

Pro osoblyvosti derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia diialnosti subiektiv pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti, poviazanoi z realizatsiieiu ta eksportom lisomaterialiv : Zakon Ukrainy vid 08.09.2005 roku No. 2860-IV u redaktsii vid 01.01.2019. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2860-15.

Ohloblina V. O., Silina I. V. (2016). Problemy ta perspektyvy vprovadzhennia ekolohichnoho strakhuvannia v Ukraini. Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii, 10, 180–184 [in Ukrainian].

Vasylyshyn Kh. R. (2011). Formuvannia ta perspektyvy rozvytku ekolohichnoho strakhuvannia lisiv Ukrainy. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, Is. 21.19, 265–271 [in Ukrainian].

Karpuk A. I., Shestak M. L. (2015). Osoblyvosti realizatsii mekhanizmu ekolohichnoho strakhuvannia lisokorystuvannia. Ekonomichnyi forum, 2, 137–141 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2021-02-03

How to Cite

Sakal, O., Третяк, Н., Штогрин , Г., & Бегаль, І. (2021). ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS A FACTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: FEATURES OF MANIFESTATION IN FORESTRY. Scientific Bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas (Series: Economics and Management in the Oil and Gas Industry), (2(22), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.31471/2409-0948-2020-2(22)-164-172