THE REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE LABOUR MARKET UKRAINE

  • H. O. Zelinskaya Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Keywords: labor market, regulation, Ukraine, employment, unemployment, population.

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of regulation of human resources in the labor market of Ukraine. The studies suggest that the situation in the Ukrainian labor market requires constant monitoring by the state. It is noted that regulation of employment and unemployment in the labor market should be the focus of attention at different levels of government, since the increase in employment leads to an improvement in the living standards of the population and helps to reduce tensions in the labor market. It is proved that the unemployment of the population is a threat to the security not only political, economic, but also social. It is found out that today Ukraine is developing according to the industrial model of economic development, which is characterized by  an increase in the demand for highly qualified personnel, focus on their innovation and mobility. Despite this, the advanced countries of the world are moving to a post-industrial model of economic development. It is proved that the modern employment system still retains the characteristic features of an industrial model. It is emphasized that the characteristic features of the current state of the Ukrainian labor market are the imbalance between supply and demand, the education system does not meet the real needs of the labor market, which requires a highly qualified competitive worker.

Special attention is paid to the issue of state regulation of employment and unemployment, in particular, it is indicated that the priority areas of state regulation of employment should be the implementation of economic policy in the interests of employment. It is determined that the state plays the role of a catalyst in the formation of social policy, and the development of human resources should become a strategic direction of the Development Programs of Ukraine. It is determined that in order to achieve the goal in the field of labor and rapid economic growth, in the conditions of population reduction, improvement of conditions and strengthen incentives for the formation of labor potential and its most effective use. It is determined that a flexible combination of state regulation and market self-government, especially now provides, on the one hand, the mitigation of the reform phase, and, on the other hand – an organized departure from centralized management to the social partnership of the state, employers and local authorities. It is recommended to introduce the model of economy with expensive labor force that will create conditions for decent work, self-realization of its citizens and decent life.

References

Bohynya D. P.(1999). Kontseptualʹni pidkhody do vyznachennya konkurentospromozhnosti robochoyi syly na rynku pratsi. Ukrayina: aspekty pratsi, –Ukraine: aspects of labor, 6, 3-6 [in Ukrainian].

Beztelesna L. I.. Yurchyk H. M. (2012). Makroekonomichni zakonomirnosti funktsionuvannya natsionalʹnoho rynku pratsi. Statystyka Ukrayiny – Statistics of Ukraine, 1(56), 22–27 [in Ukrainian].

Hryshnova E. A., Azʹmuk N. A (2014.).. Razvytye chelovecheskoho kapytala y transformatsyya form zanyatosty: vzaymovlyyanye y vzaymoobuslovlennostʹ. Demohrafiya ta sotsialʹna ekonomika – Demography and social economy, 1 (21), 85–97 [in Ukrainian].

Zayatsʹ T. A.(2013). Modernizatsiya sotsialʹno-trudovykh vidnosyn Ukrayiny: priorytetni napryamy ta pryntsypy realizatsiyi. Demohrafiya ta sotsialʹna ekonomika – Demography and social economy, 2, 179–192 [in Ukrainian].

Libanova E. M. (2013). Nova ideolohiya natsionalʹnoho rozvytku. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Ukraine economy, 4, 90–92 [in Ukrainian].

Lisohor L. S.(2003). Formuvannya rynku pratsi v Ukrayini : monohrafiya. K.: In-t ekonomiky NANU, 296 [in Ukrainian].

Rofe A. Y.(1997). Rynok truda, zanyatostʹ naselenyya, ékonomyka resursov dlya truda.M.: LYSK, 245 [in Russian].

Semykina M. V.(2015). Mekhanizmy zaynyatosti v umovakh innovatsiynykh zmin: motyvatsiynyy aspekt : monohrafiya. Kirovohrad: Kirovohr. nats. tekhn. un-t, 210 [in Ukrainian]

Semiv L. K., Huzar U. YE.(2011). Trudova diyalʹnistʹ v ekonomitsi znanʹ: pidkhody do otsinky vplyvu znannyevykh faktoriv. Rehionalʹna ekonomika – Regional economy, 3, 131–140 [in Ukrainian].

Tarshyna O. S. (2006). Derzhavna polityka zaynyatosti naselennya . Ekonomika ta derzhava – Economy and the state, 1, 77-80 [in Ukrainian].

Stiglitz J.(2003). The Roaring Nineties: Seeds of Destruction. London : Allen Lane, Penguin. 389

Schumpeter J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development . Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 255

Libanova E. M. (2003). Rynok pratsi. K: Tsentr navchalʹnoyi literatury, 224 [in Ukrainian].

Bell D.(1999). Hryadushchee postyndustryalʹnoe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsyalʹnoho prohnozyrovanyya. Per. s anhl. M.: Academia, 548 [in Russian].

Laushkin O. M. (2015). Transformatsiya zaynyatosti v umovakh novoyi ekonomiky: avtoref. dys. kand. ekon. nauk Vinnytsya, 20 [in Ukrainian].

Ekonomichna aktyvnistʹ naselennya Ukrayiny 2015. (2016): Stat. zb. K.: Derzhavna sluzhba s statystyky Ukrayiny, 201 [in Ukrainian].

Ekonomichna aktyvnistʹ naselennya Ukrayiny 2016. (2017): Stat. zb. K.: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny, 211 [in Ukrainian].

Ekonomichna aktyvnistʹ naselennya Ukrayiny 2017. (2018).: Stat. zb. K.: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny, 221 [in Ukrainian].

Statystychnyy shchorichnyk Ukrayiny za 2015 rik. (2016). Derzhsluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. K., 575 [in Ukrainian].

Statystychnyy shchorichnyk Ukrayiny za 2016 rik. (2017). Derzhsluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. K., 586 [in Ukrainian].

Herasymchuk V. I. (2001). Problemy transformatsiyi zaynyatosti i rozvytku rynku pratsi Ukrayiny (metodolohiya, analiz, shlyakhy vdoskonalennya). K.: TOV «Prynt-Ekspres», 503 [in Ukrainian].

Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
Zelinskaya, H. O. (2019). THE REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE LABOUR MARKET UKRAINE. Scientific Bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas (Series: Economics and Management in the Oil and Gas Industry), (2(20), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.31471/2409-0948-2019-2 (20)-103-111